A high-profile actor known for their vocal support of progressive causes faces the possibility of losing their multimillion-dollar estate in Malibu due to unprecedented hikes in property taxes.

Local officials have cited the need to fund social programs as the reason behind the steep increase, a move that some say is ironic given the celebrity's public criticism of such initiatives as wasteful and ineffective.

The actor has long been an outspoken advocate for progressive causes but has been less vocal about property taxes or government overreach in their personal life.

Now faced with selling the mansion, the actor finds themselves in a predicament that highlights the burden placed on high-profile individuals who are targeted for taxation and raises questions about government overreach.

The situation underscores the disconnect between what activists say and do when it comes to social issues versus their personal economic interests.

Local residents have been outspoken, questioning whether such large tax increases are fair or necessary given the current economy.

“These taxes are punishing those who have worked hard to build a life in Malibu,” said one concerned homeowner. “It’s like hitting the people who donate to these causes with both barrels.”

The irony is not lost on critics, who note that while this celebrity has been vocal about social issues from afar, they haven’t spoken up until now when it directly affects their financial situation.

When property taxes rise by 200 percent in a single year, the impact can be devastating for those who have invested heavily in real estate.

The actor’s predicament highlights a growing concern that high-profile individuals are being targeted with disproportionate tax burdens.

Will this celebrity become an activist against property taxes?

One stands alone: A million-dollar question.